I agree, if the payment amount is near the channel size I want, Lightning is convenient because it directly creates inbound liquidity, kill two birds with one stone! As Darthcoin commented, if the amount is much larger than the channel size I want or have, then using on‑chain avoids tying up unexpectedly large capacity in a single channel.
I agree, if the payment amount is near the channel size I want, Lightning is convenient because it directly creates inbound liquidity, kill two birds with one stone! As Darthcoin commented, if the amount is much larger than the channel size I want or have, then using on‑chain avoids tying up unexpectedly large capacity in a single channel.