pull down to refresh
does this mean, pay them to recommend/review? My impression of the self-publishing world (at least as far as fiction goes) is that there is a huge amount of this. Everyone is battling to get seen, and so you have to beg, plead, bribe reviewers to talk about your book, leave a review, mention it on their pod. It didn't seem to be working well (and my interaction with it was from before the AI wave).
I was referring to how we reward zappers for identifying quality content.
That’s the secret sauce and figuring out a way to do it that doesn’t have the bizarre Keynesian Beauty Contest incentives would be a game changer.
Rewards are such a tough nut to crack. It doesn't feel like we've got it figured out in a way that really drives people to look for the good posts and zap 'em.
Pay readers for their curation services and develop reputations as thinking meat bags
If content becomes abundant, reputation and curation become more valuable — but I’m not convinced humans become editors for machines. We still choose the questions.
I’m not suggesting that we do become editors for machines. If people don’t want to consume AI content, then surfacing human content is a service that should be rewarded.
Pay readers for their curation services and develop reputations as thinking meat bags