pull down to refresh
25 sats \ 5 replies \ @TheBTCManual 14 Mar 2023 \ on: RoboSats trying to find how hacker stole ~5M sats from its onchain swaps feature bitcoin
Oef, that's the trouble with building someones always going to be testing your security, and I guess that's the cost of building tools that become anti-fragile over time
They don't become antifragile. That statement makes no sense. I believe you wanted to say they are antifragile since the beginning, which is wrong anyway.
reply
fiatjaf, why diesn't that make sense?
Antifragility is a property of systems in which they increase in capability to thrive as a result of stressors, shocks, volatility, noise, mistakes, faults, attacks, or failures.
Never read Antifragile by Taleb. Just seems to make sense.
reply
The system doesn't become stronger by itself. It literally needs devs to fix the bugs, or the system would die.
reply
Sure, I can see that nuance.
I guess I was working with the premise that devs fixing bugs on a project is a system of sorts.
reply
I think you could look at it that way, counting the devs as part of the system. But if you do that, they become the weakness. Attack the devs that fix the bugs & take down the system.
Devs are the white blood cells, fixing the system when it needs fixing, but there is nothing antifragile about that.
reply