pull down to refresh
related posts
35 sats \ 1 reply \ @tomlaies 15 Mar 2023
This is exactly why Bitcoin is built on simplicity and elegant cryptography with decades of real world usage instead of the newest and shiniest complicated zk-proofs.
@DarthCoin insert Moon sexdoll meme here pls
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 15 Mar 2023
Why that meme? Is it related?
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @KingZing 14 Mar 2023
oh man, hope it doesn't hurt them too bad.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @P2P_bitcoin OP 14 Mar 2023
The link for this post uses a read-only front-end for Twitter, which can be easier to read for viewing a full Twitter thread. The Tweet that kicked off the thread is:
https://twitter.com/RoboSats/status/1635432123648622593 [Nitter]
Here's where the amount and the destination bitcoin address are discussed:
https://t.me/s/robosats/19161
https://t.me/s/robosats/19164
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @Entrep 15 Mar 2023
Is the way they joke on they wanting to know how user did it. Platforms that learn from their bugs grow faster
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @lunanto 15 Mar 2023
More security procedures should be used on sats protocols and platforms
reply
25 sats \ 1 reply \ @Busybe3z 14 Mar 2023
They will find the wallet, but prob not the identity of the culprit(s)
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @13atoms 15 Mar 2023 freebie
The culprit really should take this route & claim a possible reward:
"the user that took advantage of this bug, we would greatly appreciate if you share how this trick was done 😁"
<<This is the way>>
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @crybaby 14 Mar 2023
oof didn't robosats just get some big push recently? don't remember if it was something released but they made a few headlines last week. I know they've been around awhile I'm just curious if this is an attack in response to that not that it matters
reply
25 sats \ 1 reply \ @TonyGiorgio 14 Mar 2023
Can someone point me to their swap specific code?
reply
414 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 14 Mar 2023
This is the PR for the fix: https://github.com/Reckless-Satoshi/robosats/pull/388
From https://nitter.net/shyfire131/status/1635630834551259136
reply
25 sats \ 5 replies \ @TheBTCManual 14 Mar 2023
Oef, that's the trouble with building someones always going to be testing your security, and I guess that's the cost of building tools that become anti-fragile over time
reply
27 sats \ 4 replies \ @fiatjaf 14 Mar 2023
They don't become antifragile. That statement makes no sense. I believe you wanted to say they are antifragile since the beginning, which is wrong anyway.
reply
35 sats \ 3 replies \ @xz 14 Mar 2023
fiatjaf, why diesn't that make sense?
Antifragility is a property of systems in which they increase in capability to thrive as a result of stressors, shocks, volatility, noise, mistakes, faults, attacks, or failures.
Never read Antifragile by Taleb. Just seems to make sense.
reply
25 sats \ 2 replies \ @gandlaf21 15 Mar 2023
The system doesn't become stronger by itself. It literally needs devs to fix the bugs, or the system would die.
reply
35 sats \ 1 reply \ @xz 15 Mar 2023
Sure, I can see that nuance.
I guess I was working with the premise that devs fixing bugs on a project is a system of sorts.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @gandlaf21 16 Mar 2023
I think you could look at it that way, counting the devs as part of the system. But if you do that, they become the weakness. Attack the devs that fix the bugs & take down the system.
Devs are the white blood cells, fixing the system when it needs fixing, but there is nothing antifragile about that.
reply on another page