pull down to refresh

Somehow being stupid and wrong is more defensible than being smart and wrong. I think it's because the stupid and wrong can play victims. Therefore, if your goal is to be a nuisance, argue a stupid position baiting your enemy into annoyance and insults, then you can gather support by pointing out how cruel your opponent is. They wouldn't be this cruel and upset unless they were wrong or hiding something.

Being stupid and wrong in a manner deliberate and designed to evade the truth and confound reasoned argument which would expose ones hypocrisy is a powerful strategy often used.
It can provoke a hostile emotive response and make the recipient as a result look defensive and weak.
But it also exposes the perpetrators inability to defend and argue their position from a position of fact based reason.
Thier deliberate stupidity is designed to divert and confound discovery of the truth...and to even ridicule the process of such discovery.
It is in large part the weakness and bias of the observers of such a dialogue tolerating such manipulation that gives the troll a chance of appearing the victor even while they are inherently compromised.

reply

If someone does it on purpose they're not being stupid tho, they're playing stupid.

I know people that are stupid and often wrong. I forgive them the same way I forgive smart people that are wrong.

Unfortunately, I also know a lot of people that fake it, then bait you, then stab you right through the eye and finally feast on the remains of what their bubble thinks was your reputation. It's mostly troublesome when people with large bubbles do this, or when your boss is in their bubble.

reply
I know people that are stupid and often wrong. I forgive them the same way I forgive smart people that are wrong.

this sentence is pretty good. I'm going to talk to my kids about this.

reply

Thank you.

I didn't imagine that comment being of pedagogical value much but perhaps it is. I don't really think I was taught this as a kid. To my memory it was more like: "someone is wrong then they apologize then you accept their apology and you move on". Which isn't the same thing because it's reactive vs proactive, I guess.

reply

sincerely, sometimes I imagine you like this meme

reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 12 Jul -130 sats

@DarthCoin is an NSA agent posing as a Libertarian.

@DarthCoin is a fraud and spy.

Here is his 'citadel' -

https://m.stacker.news/147965

Have fun being infiltrated by this NSA mole.