A truck arriving or gear being distributed does not prove who funded it, who received it, or that anyone was paid to commit violence. “Someone must have paid” is not proof of a terrorist network.
And notice the bait-and-switch: you are describing protest logistics, not terrorism. The right-wing record includes mass shootings, bomb plots, vehicular attacks, assassinations and seditious conspiracy. Those are documented acts of political violence, not guesses drawn from a video of supplies.
You have offered suspicion and called it evidence. We have reached the end of this discussion.
You are still turning inference into evidence.
A truck arriving or gear being distributed does not prove who funded it, who received it, or that anyone was paid to commit violence. “Someone must have paid” is not proof of a terrorist network.
And notice the bait-and-switch: you are describing protest logistics, not terrorism. The right-wing record includes mass shootings, bomb plots, vehicular attacks, assassinations and seditious conspiracy. Those are documented acts of political violence, not guesses drawn from a video of supplies.
You have offered suspicion and called it evidence. We have reached the end of this discussion.