pull down to refresh

In federal court, the Department of Energy agreed—for purposes of this case—that the October 2025 grant cancellations were:

  • not based on scientific merit
  • not based on program performance
  • not based on saving money
  • not based on DOE priorities

Instead, DOE stipulated that the deciding factor was whether the grant recipient was located in a Blue State or a non-Blue State.

Even more striking, DOE agreed that this political sorting wasn't part of its own review process. Career staff had recommended terminating similar grants in both red and blue states, but the final termination notices overwhelmingly hit blue-state grants.

That is a fundamentally different story.

Every administration changes policy priorities. That's politics.

Using federal money to treat Americans differently because of the politics of the state they live in is something else entirely.

The high-signal read isn't about climate policy.

It's about whether the federal government can use taxpayer dollars as a political reward-and-punishment system.

If that principle stands, it won't stop with energy grants.

Tomorrow it could be disaster relief, transportation, education, health care, housing, or any other federal program.

The issue isn't who wins the next election.

It's whether Americans are treated equally by their own government regardless of how their state votes.

Now we get to see selectorate theory in action.

reply
1356 sats \ 72 replies \ @coffeebadger 24 Jul -1500 sats

Because blue states are preparing a communist revolution. We have to cut them off ahead of time. We won't/can't provide disaster relief to territory that is in open revolt. They can ask the PRC for assistance.

101 sats \ 11 replies \ @Yermin OP 25 Jul -431 sats

I see someone paid heavily to bury this post.

43 sats \ 7 replies \ @Yermin OP 25 Jul -431 sats

The evidence never changed. Someone just spent 65,011 sats trying to make fewer people see it.

1 sat \ 6 replies \ @Yermin OP 25 Jul -431 sats

To those who called me a “nigger”:

I understand the message. Being Black and a Democrat makes me an enemy in your political worldview. This thread has made that unmistakably clear.

This administration has repeatedly used its power to reverse Black progress,restricting voting access, erasing Black history and achievement from public institutions, dismantling diversity programs, and attacking institutions built to serve a multiracial democracy.

You are right about one thing: power matters.

This administration has shown that it will use federal power not merely to defeat political opponents, but to punish the Americans it associates with them, even when doing so harms its own voters.

I am Black. I am an American. I am not leaving, disappearing, or surrendering my rights so that your vision of America can remain comfortable.

6 sats \ 0 replies \ @Yermin OP 25 Jul -431 sats

The market is speaking, but so are a few deep pockets. If you think this court filing deserves sunlight, help keep it on the front page.