pull down to refresh

To 1: Heres a thought about bitcoin not really having a major stablecoin on its protocol:
I know tether got started on bitcoin's Omni. Also, i heard of the HRF issuing a bounty to make a USD peg. But, imagine if bitcoin had as much stablecoin activity on it as ETH. What would happen if there was a fork splitting bitcoin? Everyone who holds 1 btc would get 1 of the new version too. But would everone holding 1 "bit-usd" get a second version of that? The stablecoin issuer would only be able to honor one version of the "bit-usd." Therefore the stablecoin issuer, if holding a large enough amount of user value would have to make a decision that would have way too much impact on which chain gets chosen. Even if it's not in bitcoin's bests interests.
This is another anecdote that ETH is compromised and more centralized than BTC.
reply