You expect me to believe a convicted felon, found by a court to have engaged in insurrection, found liable for sexual abuse by a jury, who pardoned people convicted of seditious conspiracy, and whose long association with Jeffrey Epstein has raised persistent public scrutiny, suddenly became a neutral judge of “wasteful spending”?
Especially when the government admitted in court that the grants were selected based on the recipient state’s political identity?
You expect me to believe a convicted felon, found by a court to have engaged in insurrection, found liable for sexual abuse by a jury, who pardoned people convicted of seditious conspiracy, and whose long association with Jeffrey Epstein has raised persistent public scrutiny, suddenly became a neutral judge of “wasteful spending”?
Especially when the government admitted in court that the grants were selected based on the recipient state’s political identity?