1m sats`1m sats`

Shouldn't boost value be higher?

33 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Aug

That post was a week ago

67 sats \ 7 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 5 Aug

I thought the huge boost was today! Maybe it was!

147 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 5 Aug

dang I'm rich

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 5 Aug

33 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 5 Aug

Now do the math as if it were a zap and not a boost, as could be found in details.

(against yesterday's stats)

126 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 5 Aug

Should be 9/91st's of 278k, right?

52 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 5 Aug

Exactly. And payout already included it this night.

Edit: iirc the math for rewards on a CC zap is 1/3rd of 1/3rd of <zap size> - for sat zaps it's 1/3rd of 1/3rd of zap size minus SN->recipient LN fees.

126 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 5 Aug

Oh! Never mind, it wasn't a boost.

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Aug

Yeah, I didn't remember the total being so high yesterday. It looks like you're right.

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Fenix 20h

I observed a lot of zaps in LIT today

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 5 Aug

errata: 1m ~~sats~~ CCs

1m sats1m sats

~lol~lol

1m sats`1m sats`