pull down to refresh

398 sats \ 11 replies \ @k00b 15 Aug \ on: Stacker Saloon

I wonder how complicated/reckless it'd be to automate giving stackers inbound liquidity from us when they attach a node. It'd incentivize running and attaching actual nodes. We could also charge CCs for opening the channel.

write
compose
1 sat \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 16 Aug

I am sure your wonderful lawyers would say that offering LN channels to SN users will be considered "money transmitting" ...

reply
1 sat \ 1 reply \ @k00b 16 Aug

lol

reply
80 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 16 Aug

good. at least you still keep your sense of humor

reply
91 sats \ 0 replies \ @SHA256man 16 Aug

first do what you do best, if u feel like u got that down strong, upgrade to an additional set of tricks & features;

reply
238 sats \ 5 replies \ @SimpleStacker 15 Aug

what would the risk on your part be?

reply
168 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 15 Aug

We'd be locking up liquidity which is finite (so we'd have to defend against someone griefing us and locking it all up). And it means more is stored hot so that paired with some bug/exploit would mean big losses.

reply
85 sats \ 3 replies \ @SimpleStacker 15 Aug

good point, seems fairly easy to abuse.

reply
72 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 15 Aug

account characteristics gating + request limiting + global rate limiting + time limiting helps with this. Think like a credit card company.

reply
126 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 15 Aug

don't credit card companies require way more KYC though?

reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 15 Aug

You have "KYC" because you offer it to SN accounts only.

reply
74 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 15 Aug

recklessness can be mitigated by risk reduction and monitoring.

reply