pull down to refresh

The bot is right, though. Slop or not.
I'm not signing up with a central platform to see those posts and comments.

So for all intents and purposes, I have no way to benefit from your links.

reply
258 sats \ 10 replies \ @Wumbo 26 Aug
The bot is right, though

I feel like that is going to become a more common saying on the web in the near future.

reply

Not gonna lie, my first instinct was "oh please, no, not that."

But then again, if the bot is indeed right, why would I be miffed about it? Because it was "righter" than a human?

Humans are wrong all the time and we have no qualms when another one corrects them. Why do I cringe at the thought that bots could get it right more often?

My short answer: Who the heck knows. Maybe I am a special snowflake after all.

reply
436 sats \ 8 replies \ @optimism 22h

Automated opinion c&p is lame. It was lame before LLMs and it is lame now. And this is a pre-LLM bot.

reply
230 sats \ 7 replies \ @unboiled 21h

Lame or not, some people still don't seem to understand that outsiders cannot access X.

To me those are the same as posting WSJ paywalled links in open forums.

Lameness does not reduce the validity of a point made.

reply
105 sats \ 6 replies \ @optimism 21h

I agree too - I won't sign up for X. The bot used to fix that. The fix got fucked because it depends on permission. Now the bot berates posters instead of helping those that don't have an X account.

The point was made by @nerd2ninja, here: #1555006. We can have the discussion there. If you think it isn't visible enough, start a post. It doesn't need to be C&P'd under all the posts by the bot though, that is spam itself.

reply
132 sats \ 5 replies \ @anon 20h

This whole discussion is retarded. Do you want the primary source or not?

If you want to be informed first use X. stacker.news is a content aggregator with maybe 12 active users. I don't care about any of their opinions of a more successful social media. If roman storm posts on stacker.news then I'll give a shit what @nitter has to say.

reply

So the point of my original message is if you like X so much, go use that and leave me alone with my 12 active users, but if you're going to share content with us, let it be something we can actually read and engage with, because you're otherwise just being annoying.

I won't bother with my specific opinion on the automated posts nitter is making since it seems pretty well hashed out, but I did want to go ahead and add that thought.

103 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 20h

If you don't give a shit, why are you commenting?

Roman Storm would be a very interesting AMA.

But in this case, I did quote the whole tweet. I include the link for those who want to verify.

reply

Fair point. And I thank you for that.

reply

That's the second issue here - the bot not only berated you with some preset text, it berated you in error.

"X links are spam", sure whatever. So are all the paywalls, the scam promotions, the drama, the endless podcast bullshit, the news... basically nearly everything we see, also on SN. The comments are sometimes useful.

Repeated bot messages are spam too though. Fighting fire with even more retarded fire. This bot used to be useful. Now it is some activist tool that tries to make posters feel guilty, so it is muted for me now. Somehow the SN popo is back at it and I'm not having it. I regret commenting to it though.

reply
105 sats \ 2 replies \ @unboiled 21h
This bot used to be useful. Now it is some activist tool that tries to make posters feel guilty

Agreed on that.

But I also think a lot of people don't even realize that X links aren't accessible without creating an account.
It doesn't justify the guilt tripping though. I'm with you on that.

reply
3 sats \ 1 reply \ @nitter 21h
It doesn't justify the guilt tripping though. I'm with you on that.

The message could definitely be improved. Any suggestions for making it less guilt-trippy?

I want to change it anyway, because I think @nerd2ninja is getting a notification for every linked item. He could mute me too, though, lol.

reply
105 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 21h

Message has been updated

reply
105 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 21h

I get that it's annoying, so I'm with you on muting me, but I think it's a valuable reminder that most discussion happens inside a walled garden, and users don't even realize.

It's not just for the OP to read; it's for everyone to read. It's nice that @Scoresby puts in the effort to copy the content from Twitter, but this just proves my point. It's ridiculous that he has to do that. And the replies are still hidden. So the discussion itself, the most valuable part of Twitter, is STILL not accessible.

reply