pull down to refresh
related posts
5 sats \ 1 reply \ @Wumbo 23 Mar 2023
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/23/block-shares-plunge-after-hindenburg-says-jack-dorseys.html
Lesson for the class: When you list one percentage range and then associated it to multiple reasons, you have know clue how the different reasons are proportioned.
Is it 99% users who have more than one account (which I don't know why that would be an issue) and 1% involved in fraud. Or is the other way around.
Also what is considered fraud?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @faithandcredit 23 Mar 2023
If KYC and AML wasnt a thing there would be little to no incentive to create "fake accounts".
Its like how the government makes certain drugs illegal, and then all of sudden they can do a headline "See! All sellers of the drugs are criminals" its technically true, but only because they made selling the drugs a crime.. But why did they do that?
reply
3 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 23 Mar 2023
I just read this article and posted a few minutes ago. This is a serious attack on Jack. Traditional finance would be much happier if Jack was out of the picture.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @shyfire 23 Mar 2023
"$SQ is a buy!"
"No, stack sats."
"Supporting SQ will help hyperbitcoinization though?"
"Stack moar sats."
Voices in my head...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @faithandcredit 23 Mar 2023
Is this supposed to be taken serious?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @gunson 23 Mar 2023
Some of this is bullshit "Block didn't comply hard enough", but some of the fraud allegations seem to need answering.
reply