pull down to refresh

47 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 30 Aug \ parent \ on: SN won't be the same without @DarthCoin meta bitcoin
alienating Super and now Darth isn't a positive trend

Especially since it's not clear what, if anything, was gained in either case.

write
compose
67 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 30 Aug

I think gaining a wallet that SN supports within its own interface, not needing external connections, but can still be converted to real sats, is a big gain

reply
61 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 30 Aug

I don’t personally dislike either addition but it remains to be seen if they attract or retain more/better stackers than they repel.

reply
23 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 30 Aug

Yea, the BBS and connectors is the product, sybil fees are the service.

Adding a wallet to a site that still requires an external wallet to even get into is neither a connector nor a solution to users without a wallet already.

CC's didn't stop the service from being custodial either if legal paranoia was the justification, it's still inter-mediating payments and you still trust its invoice generation.

It probably would have been easier to plop CLINK or NWC into the Spark SDK for connector support rather than adding the Spark SDK to SN.

reply