pull down to refresh
thank you for your question. tbh i'm just trying to not be shadowbanned and find some open minded bitcoiners out there who have time to read long essays and discuss hyperbitcoinization.
some of my friends avoid talking to me ever since i started working on this. most normies think i'm scamming them for financial gains, but i'm not (i sent most of my nahs to Satoshi Nakamoto and some other team members who helped me put this project together). but that's not a problem. i been trying to talk to people about bitcoin for more than a decade so i'm used to people saying i'm scamming them. what i dislike is the silence i have received from my other friends who are real bitcoiners, and the shadowbanning i got from places that are supposed to be against censorship.
to me, strong constructive criticism is a lot better than silence and shadowbanning. so far i've gotten some real feedback here so that is awesome. my job is simply to get the word out, to get people to talk about unit bias and hyperbitcoinization.
from my point of view, this nah•sovereign•diamond project is the only path to hyperbitcoinization (especially since fiat controlled media have been trying to shadowban it). i know that sounds absurd to a lot of people, and even to myself sometimes. maybe i'm just trying to find one person who can critically explain to me why my team and myself are wrong so we can stop wasting our lives on this?
and if i can't find a real reason to convince myself to stop pushing this, i have no other choice but to continue.
or maybe i'm trying to push Satoshi Nakamoto to come back. maybe he's been lurking around SN and seeing my post. because if he does not sell the nahs i sent him, nah will continue to outperform sat, attracting more bitcoiners, and the unit of account of the bitcoin timechain will become the thing i'm working on.
maybe i'm not wasting my time and money after all (trust me i hate zap wars too but if it has to be done then it will be done). if i can help make peer to peer electronic cash a reality for everyone, it'd be a crime if i allow myself to stop.
of course, 99.99% of stacker news users will initially doubt. but if we got lucky and find just one or two stackers who take the time to research and contribute into this project, then the zap war would have produced a good outcome.
I've had similar experiences in those places.
But I'm curious what you are aiming to achieve. Most bitcoiners are not likely to be sympathetic to you project, perhaps especially so here where many normally "accepted" Bitcoin projects like Spark, ecash, and Ark receive strong criticism.
What's your goal in posting about your project in a place where most users will not be open to it?