pull down to refresh

While I enjoyed the book enough to begin reading the second book in the series, Echopraxia, it was frustrating. It contained too much jargon too early. I know better readers that love what I'm complaining about though: thickening a setting with made up or obscure nouns. I can't stand it. It also told a blurry story.

The book explored many awesome concepts, biologically plausible vampires for one ("space vampires" is how many people remember the book), but most concepts were pursued too obliquely to be satisfying. For that matter, the story was told too obliquely, blurry as I said, but that might've been a deliberate choice given the (dis)abilities of the character telling the story. (It might also be an exaggeration of the author's normal style now that I'm a few chapters into the second book.)

Some of the other concepts explored were the role of sentience in intelligence, first contact, a few flavors of transhumanism told with deeper reasoning than I've read elsewhere, space travel, virtual reality, human purpose in a post-scarce world, biological curiousities as implied by the book's title, and probably others that I'm forgetting. It was a lot of good broth and little beef though. For all of these concepts, I don't understand the author's view of them and how they coexist. It often felt like the author was avoiding the plainness that I wanted. It felt like they created mystery by telling the story mysteriously rather than telling a story that contained mysteries.

But I did enjoy it on net. The concepts were cool and it kept my interest even if I didn't want the insecure arrangement of words.

I give it three meat morsels on the k00bimeater.

I'm currently reading a book with a lot of made up nouns (The Quantum Thief) and it is exactly what you describe: not good. I'm hanging in because there are cool ideas circulating in the murk, but I wish authors would back off the new terminology a bit.

As far as space vampires go, you probably already read Octavia Butler's Patternmaster series, but if you haven't it is really fun. Not a lot of jargon, but some great storytelling.

reply
135 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 9 Sep

I thought it was just my pet peeve. I get so hung up trying to catalog all the new nouns not knowing if they're important or not.

you probably already read Octavia Butler's Patternmaster series

I haven't! Something to add to my list.

reply

It would have been fun to write a review that was just all the annoying made up jargon the author included.

reply

When reading this book I had the impression that author wanted to share as much cool scientific stuff as possible and the story was just necessary evil to do that.

reply

Do I have your permission to post my photo evidence that you in fact did read this book

reply

do I look strong and tough?

reply

inquisitive and flexible

reply
104 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 9 Sep

I’m disappointed in myself, but you can share the evidence

reply

without further ado I present

reply
2 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 9 Sep

very inquisitive indeed

reply

yes bruh

reply

I love Peter Watts, but I also feel like I need a ton of custom drugs to really get everything he's doing. Some brilliant ideas, though. The Rifters trilogy is still my favorite thing of his.

reply

I haven’t read The Rifters. He mentioned it in the afterword. I might do it next.

reply

I'm gonna need at least 4/5 morsels lol. I don't have alot of time - but thanks for sharing Koob haha.

reply