pull down to refresh
You are misrepresenting what I have said, again . . .
Because you cannot credibly refute what I have said.
Really? What other argument is there for your preferred economic system?
I have given it one hundred times.
It is not my personal preference that matters- again you assert what I have not stated- I do not have one- it is the real world performance that results in global domination across commodity markets, manufactured goods, energy production and distribution, building of infrastructure- ports, rail, roads, telecommunications, shipping and the development and production of technology like PVs, lithium batteries, EVs, robotics, nanotech, biotech, LEDs, gyroscopes, drones, refined rare earths and other strategic supply chains and all manner of productive goods and services that deliver wealth, security and prosperity to a nation and its people.
Nothing you described can be attributed to government intervention. That's all private sector labor.
Wrong.
Chinas mixed model of state led capital direction toward strategic infrastructure and development combined with private sector enterprise is precisely what has delivered Chinas economic dominance over the USA.
Rare earths refining was a deliberate strategic development as was electricity generation and efficiency along with EVs, PVs, LEDs and millions of trained engineers and technicians.
Directing capital, labour and resources toward the maximisation of the nations productive capacity and output.
The majority of the politburo are trained engineers.
Then why are they losing WWIII?
China has not expended a single military hardware or soldier or civilian though it has profited significantly from the sale of drone parts and other dual use goods and services along with the purchase of significantly discounted oil and gas from Russia and Iran while enjoying huge strategic advantage via its vast reserves of oil and gas, booming sales of PVs, EVs and lithium batteries as the world moves away from fossil fuels toward more sustainable technology.
Meanwhile USA has expended most of its soft power capital and nearly all of its Interceptors.
USA can't make anymore Interceptors unless Xi removes the embargo on export of refined rare earths to US military supply chains.
Good luck with that.
The US military network is depleted and exposed as deficit and incapable of maintaining secure trade routes, power projection and protection of subservient tribute states.
It has dragged many into a war they don't want and that is costing them dearly.
All for the sake of the Zionist war criminals who own USA...helping them to expand via land grabs and genocide and other war crimes toward their dream of a Greater Israel.
Who is losing?
Suez-Hormuz-end of petrodollar empire.
China has not expended a single military hardware or soldier or civilian though it has profited significantly from the sale of drone parts and other dual use goods and services along with the purchase of significantly discounted oil and gas from Russia and Iran while enjoying huge strategic advantage via its vast reserves of oil and gas, booming sales of PVs, EVs and lithium batteries as the world moves away from fossil fuels toward more sustainable technology.
Great. Make a move on Taiwan and put those batteries to work. Let's see what happens.
Even the shipping is made safe by the US government under the command of a free-market entrepreneur.
China produces over 50% of global shipping capacity today.
USA- less than 1%.
You lost the trade war.
Suez-Hormuz-end of empire.
Not losing anything. The war just started.
No more rare earths = No more Interceptors.
You had lost already, before you started it.
There's no echo chamber on the right. Yours is the default opinion.
"Durr da state should gib money to da poor people, den errybody gon be rich." That's your socialist philosophy. No one's ignoring it. Everyone has heard it a billion times in a billiion ways.