9/11 certainly changed our world, all for the worse.
And I've long been suspicious of the official 9/11 narrative. Which is this:
19 Arab hijackers, mostly Saudi nationals, led by Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda seized four commercial airliners using box cutters. Two planes flew into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and one into the Pentagon. and the fourth, United Flight 93 crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 Americans died that day.
I think the official narrative is a full-on psy-op, and that the truth is much darker.
I've looked up a lot of sources on this, and I believe this video is one of the most concise and well organized.. It's a YouTube video by James Lee (5149jameslee.com).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZng1eydHJ8.
This is a short summary from AI. And AI, of course, disputes the charges. This is from Claude, it would be interesting to see how other models deal with it
- The "dancing Israelis" — five Israeli men from Urban Moving Systems in New Jersey were arrested on 9/11 after a witness reported them photographing and apparently celebrating the burning towers. The video says the FBI concluded the company was a Mossad front, and that its owner fled to Israel and the office was emptied.
- The "art student" spy ring — a 2001 DEA memo about young Israelis with military-intelligence backgrounds visiting federal offices; the video emphasizes some lived near Mohamed Atta in Hollywood, Florida.
- Hijacker links to Israel — Flight 93 pilot Ziad Jarrah's relatives were later arrested in Lebanon for spying for Israel; a German paper reportedly said Israeli cells were watching several hijackers.
- Suppressed reporting — Carl Cameron's 2001 Fox News series on detained Israelis, later removed from the site; Odigo employees allegedly warned by text two hours before the attacks.
- Financial motive — unusual put-option volume on United and American Airlines and on WTC-exposed banks before 9/11, with the SEC finding no evidence of informed trading (which the narrator reads as a cover-up).
- "Lucky Larry" Silverstein and Howard Lutnick — both absent from the towers that morning; Silverstein's insurance payout and his "pull it" remark about WTC 7, which the video treats as an admission of controlled demolition; Lutnick's absence and insurance money.
- WTC 7 and the BBC — the building's collapse described as a demolition, and the BBC reporting it fallen about 20 minutes early as evidence of foreknowledge.
- Netanyahu's "it's very good" quote on September 12 as evidence of motive.
Tucker carlson also has a great set of videos on this topic.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYa964dzJh1IcwI7W8vKVtLQ7NLH-B0DL
The one I was most impressed with was this one, the one on the controlled demolition of Tower 7:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-UHpHezjdk
I haven't looked into it deeply, but there are clearly aspects that are implausibly coincidental and as yet without explanation.
Also, there's just no reasonable explanation for building 7.
You're right, there's no adequate explanation. And apparently, anytime the video of how it collapsed is shown to somebody who understands controlled demolition, they immediately say "it's a controlled demolition".
The Tucker Carlson video of it is outstanding. If I remember right, he's interviewing the former head of...some kind of association of architects or building engineers, something like that, who's just very explicit and detailed about why it could be NOTHING but a controlled demolition.
I'm pretty sure I've seen the Tucker videos on this.
The most damning thing is the lack of interest in follow up questions for the anomalies. There might be good reasons for something odd happening, but there's no good reason to not want people asking questions about the odd thing that happened.
It certainly concentrated power toward the military hawks in the US and to the benefit of Israel.
Trump is still more than ever enabling The Greater Israel Project as the Zionists are desperate to realise their dream of empire before their current host loses its ability to enable them.
But ultimately if it was a false flag operation it has been an own goal.
As the WSJ argues 9/11 ultimately accelerated if not precipitated the decline of US power and status.
'Sept. 11 Changed the World Order. But Not for the Reason We May Think.
The terrorist attacks consumed U.S. resources and attention, and left the country unable to address the bigger threats to its economy and global leadership.
When the World Trade Center towers crashed to the ground 25 years ago, they triggered a seismic wave that seemed to smash the world order.
It was now “a different world,” President George W. Bush warned Congress. Secretary of State Colin Powell declared: “It was before 9/11 and after 9/11.” Vice President Dick Cheney added: “That day changed everything.”
They were right, with a caveat. The attacks were a monumental tragedy. The world order did change. But it was the aftermath—the U.S. response to 9/11, not the terrorism itself—that made the difference.
Sept. 11 marked a shockingly successful attack by a stateless and relatively small group of Islamist militants. The U.S., though, launched a massive military response: a War on Terror. It attacked two countries, one uninvolved with 9/11. The rhetoric was so sweeping, Washington borrowed language from World War II and the Cold War. America was now confronting an Axis of Evil.
Consumed by the War on Terror, the U.S. had less capacity to address other global priorities such as the pivotal rise of China and an increasingly hostile Russia. That inattention to shifting global forces was what really changed the world.
U.S. leaders were “certainly distracted” and “we continually found ourselves sucked back into the morass of our misadventures in the Middle East,” William Burns, who served in several administrations and later became director of the CIA, said in 2019. “Imagine if a bigger part of the time, energy and resources spent on the Global War on Terror had instead been spent on giving form to an affirmative vision for America’s role in Asia.”
“China and Russia have welcomed” the War on Terror, the scholar Robert Kagan wrote in 2008, “because it has distracted the United States’ strategic focus away from them.” '
I don't think that the official narrative for a such a big disaster could be totally false. Also pointing towards Israel in controversies is rather psy-op.
Why because ..Israel would rather fly into an islamic tower than in America.
Israel needs to keep Americans hating Islam, and keep America fighting the wars that they want fought, at great expense to America.
If it's true that Israel did this, then it was extraordinarily successful with both of these goals.
And...downzapped 200 sats. It's always just enough to get pushed off the first page or two.
There are definitely a lot of unanswered questions here pof! I really don’t want to talk about the bad things on my mind at all..
🔗 Privacy-friendly video links:
I believe in the theory that they themselves brought down the towers.
Also just saw this in "related posts". I had no idea.
Evidence of Israeli involvement in 9/11 inscribed into Bitcoin time-chain