pull down to refresh
Starting to sound like this kruw:
I don't understand why this issue got to you, but I wish you had kept it about the lightning rather than made it about calling people names.
You already conceded this discussion is about lightning, remember? #1569856
I misread the tweet, so you are right that it's about lightning.
My scam warning is focused exclusively on lightning's technical details, are there any corrections I should make to my post?
Your scam warning is not exclusively about lightning. If it was, you wouldn't have made the extra leap to accusing Justin of stealing people's money.
Here is the correction you can make:
- make the post about how lightning works and how Justin is not correct about that.
- remove the unfounded accusation about draining wallets.
The accusation of draining wallets isn't "unfounded". You already conceded that innocent users who listen to Justin will lose their money, remember? #1569234
I am happy to explicitly acknowledge that keeping your lightning wallet online is important to prevent it from getting drained.
Justin refused to delete his post, confirming he is a scammer: #1570002
It's sad that you didn't even care enough about the innocent users getting their funds drained to ask Justin if he would delete his misinformation. It's even sadder this site's leadership spent >$1,000 to cover up Justin's scamming.
"Scamming" is the most generous interpretation of his actions, remember? #1566778
If he's causing people to lose their coins and profiting from it, that's bad.
If he's causing people to lose their coins and NOT profiting from it, that's even WORSE (since he can't refund their losses with his profits).
The more appropriate term for destroying user funds without profiting from it would be "terrorist", so calling him a "scammer" is me being nice to him.
I disagree. Warning Bitcoiners about their funds being drained by scammers puts myself in a good light, actually.