pull down to refresh

It’s remarkable that the most direct thing isn’t even mentioned here: use of toxic pesticides.

Conventional agriculture chemically genocides wide swaths of the natural ecology. “Better for the environment” is almost always a dumb phrase, but if it means anything shouldn’t it be not completely wiping out the native flora and fauna.

Organic agriculture refers to the farming of crops or livestock without the use of synthetic inputs. That includes synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, plant growth regulators, nanomaterials, and genetically modified organisms (GMOs).2 This doesn’t mean organic farming is chemical or pesticide-free. Chemicals are often used in organic farming, but most are not synthetically manufactured; there are a few exceptions that have been approved by the National Organic Program of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).3 Conventional — sometimes called “industrial” — farming is any agricultural system that uses one or more of the above synthetic inputs.
Organic agriculture almost always proved better on the metric of “ecotoxicity”. This measures how harmful a farming system’s chemical inputs — which are mostly pesticides — are to plants, insects, and aquatic life in the local environment. Particular chemicals have an ecotoxicity score, which is multiplied by the amount of each substance applied. Across the studies that measured it, organic farming almost always had much lower ecotoxicity than conventional farming.
Since most synthetic pesticides are banned in organic agriculture, farmers often rely more on mechanical tillage to remove weeds. That not only burns more fuel from the machinery, but can also release carbon from the soil in the form of CO2.
reply

Haha! I need to slow down.

I guess what I was thinking is that it’s weird to say that these other measures of pollution are inconclusive, when we’ve already established that one system destroys the natural ecology compared to the other.

reply

The issue is, you can't really grow enough food for everyone without using those harsh methods. Or can you?

reply

I’m not sure. The vast majority of farmland in the US is used to produce animal feed. Without GMOs and synthetic chemicals, they couldn’t produce as much factory farmed meat.

If consumers were eating mostly beans and greens, it might be possible to produce enough organically.

So, basically, “maybe, but only if people radically change their diets.”

reply

tltr

NO

ahaha

reply

100% agreed.

Not only toxic pesticides but also the fertilizers that are being used now-a-days are doing no good to the humanity or overall life. I believe these should be stopped instantly..

reply