23 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 28 Mar 2023 \ on: LinkingLion: An entity linking Bitcoin transactions to IPs? bitcoin
What do you think about this? @TonyGiorgio and @theindranetworkprotocol
write
preview
391 sats \ 2 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 28 Mar 2023
I thought it was pretty well known that this is not only possible but probable. Great research and write up though.
Another reason your bitcoin node should be tor only.
reply
1535 sats \ 1 reply \ @kristapsk 28 Mar 2023
Tor only has potential eclipse attack issues (see old paper Bitcoin over Tor isn't a good idea), for preserving privacy Tor + I2P is better way to go. Having two different privacy networks mitigates this. If possible, adding Blockstream sattelite receiver on top will also help.
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 28 Mar 2023
Also adding the banlist option in bitcoin core and remove the fuckers. I keep also a limited number of allowed peers on my bitcoin.conf.
reply
384 sats \ 0 replies \ @l0k18 28 Mar 2023
I think a money transmitting network needs to have anonymity. Transactions should never appear near the physical store of the private key.
reply