pull down to refresh
I think you told me something similar in one of my other posts. about how we should take the evolutionary behaviours of animals into account. My post is the narrative being spun in our national science curriculum
reply
My post is the narrative being spun in our national science curriculum
I don't doubt it. My problem is with how these claims are presented as established facts, rather than known relationships that present a hypothesis to be explored. Simply receiving a list of facts from authority figures and being told to believe them is the precise opposite of science.
reply
just found this question. read this and be triggered haha
reply
I actually have no problem with that.
reply
This is why the climate change discussion is so obnoxious. They present these comparative static analyses (other things equal), to freak people out, that obviously leave out so many other relevant factors that also change.
For instance, reptiles live in the warmer parts of the Earth, with much of the land mass being too cold for them. As temperatures warm, their habitable area increases and their food supply increases, so their populations actually increase. That's why, when the Earth was much warmer than it is today, every single ecosystem was dominated by reptiles.
If you actually think scientifically, you can ask yourself if their hypotheses withstand the scrutiny of the evidence we already have.