pull down to refresh
I'm still bitter about it being called a "Nobel prize" when it's a Swedish Central Bank prize and has nothing to do with Alfred Nobel.
this is a ridiculous, low-IQ take.
Yes, we all know that history. And nobody gives a flying fuck.
I have a Swedish-language piece from years ago that I should perhaps repurpose for ~econ.
https://authory.com/JoakimBook/a/a72cddf32e5c94a0682d871058a595e4c
yes, and it's been that way publicly since before you were born. It does not matter: Your low-level observation is known by everyone already. I've heard it a hundred times from pretentious goldbugs/Bitcoiners.
Go read my articles. Also: it changes nothing what the name is; it's still the most prestigious and celebrated econ prize, in honor of the longest-existing central bank.
I stand by what I say until proven otherwise:
you can also just change your mind? You're not incorrect, just stupid; it's not a meaningful/sensible/important statement to kick in the open door and remark on the name. We know. Now move on.
Your low-level observation is known by everyone already.
I'm afraid I must've slipped in a "this is some brand new insight" somewhere in my brief observation that I dislike the way it is called.
you can also just change your mind?
I'm no too hot about denying facts (well known ones for ages, too, as you like to point out) in order to protect feelings.
I'm still unsure what has you so hot and bothered when there is nothing to disagree about.
it's not a meaningful/sensible/important statement
The only one here mistaking my comment for being meant as anything meaningful or important is you.
Stating something everyone knows to be true and delusionally thinking it's worth anyone's time or attention is sort of the definition of _not meaningful _.
Welcome to the mute list. Pls fuck off
I don't get why that riles you up so much. At this moment you're not thinking clearly.
Best to let it go, or come back when you've found your balance again.
You kinda stopped making sense somewhere and I'm not sure why. It's very unusual of you. Like this:
Stating something everyone knows to be true and delusionally thinking it's worth anyone's time or attention is sort of the definition of _not meaningful _.
I thought I made it clear that I do not think it is meaningful at all:
The only one here mistaking my comment for being meant as anything meaningful or important is you.
Anyway, if muting me helps you find your zen again, good on you.
I've heard it a hundred times from pretentious goldbugs/Bitcoiners.
Oh, I think I get it now.
I suspect that quoted bit might be at the core of your Pavlovian reflex to snarl at me as soon as I mentioned my dislike of a fake Nobel prize.
Am I right?
In that case, rest assured. I disliked it long before Bitcoin existed. And I was never into gold.
I've very likely been and probably still am pretentious with regards to some things. But gold/bitcoin ain't it.
The real name is a bit unwieldy:
The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel
I also have two Mises.org pieces on the subject yous all are welcome to look into
https://mises.org/wire/two-swedes-new-economics-nobel
https://mises.org/mises-wire/conceived-disgrace-350th-anniversary-creation-bank-sweden
Maybe we need a PREDYX contract for the Nobel Prize. Seems exciting. Things happening ~econ
https://x.com/thlbr/status/2104488361498968348
@mega_dreamer