pull down to refresh
Here's how this argument seems to me:
You: Go do raindances in your yard to fight communism.
Me: I don't understand how that reduces communism.
You: You must love communism.
Yeah, you must. You have to partake in the dance.
You know we're not talking about voting in general right? We're talking about voting in 2026.
What's different about 2026 that changes this argument?
If all you can offer is a command, I'm going to ignore it.
See this proves my point. If you came to the rain dances you wouldn't ask this question. You would know why this time is different. You would feel it instinctively because you'd be invested in the game. But because you lack whimsy, you're out of the loop. If you fill in the bubbles, then you can savor the entrails of the beast up close and know good from evil.
Since you haven't explained anything to me, I have no reason to regret being out of the loop, nor do I have any reason to change my mind.
The explanation is that if Democrats win they hit us with another wave of caravans and we're all dead. What more explanation do you need?
Your bloc lets them capture zones peacefully, and then we're stuck fighting from outside which is 1,000 times harder.
The same additional explanation I've been asking for the entire time. Explain how my single non-decisive vote prevents that.
I can't make the rest of "my bloc" vote, so you're just talking to me and my one vote in a non-swing district.
Do you live in a gated community?
nope
I can't make the rest of "my bloc" vote
You have to. That's part of the game. There are 2 blocs voting Yes-Caravan, my bloc is voting No-Caravan and your bloc is abstaining. Come up with something to persuade yourself and then fix the rest of your bloc.
Getting people to do stuff they don't feel like doing for fickle utopian promises is a very important skill for us to master.
My objection is because it is not an effective means. I'm all for effective means.
I know that you're down for step 3. The problem is we have to finish step 1 first. And step 2 depends on the outcome of step 1, and then we still have to get through steps 4, 5, and 6. Step 4 is classified and you're going to disagree on step 5 but you're wrong about that too. So it would be nice if you would just learn to fall in line with the narrative today so that we don't have to go through this debate at every point in the process. This is not a normal election. We're going to end communism.
Notice how mad the left is, how utterly devastated and panicked they are over everything that's happening. My demographic bloc did that. Your bloc should listen to my bloc.
You don't have to go through the debate at every turn if you make a compelling argument now. If you won't, then expect more arguments.
I'd also caution you to not be so sure about what I will and won't disagree with.
Why "because of Darth"?
I hope not.
raindance to demoralize communists when they add up all the crackheads they need to canvas
My disagreement with that is on voting being an actual means for the individual to achieve those things. It's fascinating that you both equate my point about voting being pointless with an unwillingness to do anything. That's an enormous non-sequitur. My objection is because it is not an effective means. I'm all for effective means.
Here's how this argument seems to me:
You: Go do raindances in your yard to fight communism.
Me: I don't understand how that reduces communism.
You: You must love communism.