pull down to refresh

This is a disturbing trend. I guess allowing people/businesses to transact directly is threatening to the state and to banks/payment processors. Banning payments takes away the public possibility for a circular economy and injects the state and banks into a person's everyday life; all for the sake of AML, "financial stability" & "consumer safety".
reply
deleted by author
In a statement, Thailand’s Security and Exchange Commission expressed concern that cryptocurrencies present a risk to the stability of the Thai financial system and economy.
Businesses are required not to advertise availability for crypto payments.
If a digital asset business finds that a client is using crypto for payments instead of for investing, the business is required to notify officials, or even suspend the user’s account.
The Tourism Authority of Thailand, too, was optimistic about crypto attracting wealthy, high-value tourists after a pandemic-induced travel slump.
reply
Another article written on this development:
[Effective] April 1.
The new rules won’t affect trading or investment in cryptocurrencies.
The country plans to test its retail CBDC later this year as an alternative payment option for the public.
reply
And another article:
The Bank of Thailand (BOT), as well as the SEC, “see the benefits of various technologies behind digital assets such as blockchain and emphasize and support the use of technology to further innovation and does not block the use of digital assets for investment.”
Commercial banks might also become subject to a 3% investment cap, where only 3% of their investable capital can be allocated to digital assets
reply
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author