What to do about natural-dividend windfalls is a theme on Den's mind this year #1589657 #1565551 #1515430
Today, the Alaska Permanent Fund has assets of $88 billion. It’s not as big as Norway’s oil fund, which we discussed some time ago, but it’s the closest America has to a sovereign wealth fund. Each year, the state is allowed to draw 5% from the fund to finance government services and to pay a dividend to residents. This year, eligible residents will each receive a check for $1,200.
But interestingly, at first it consisted only of bonds -- even though this was, in principle, a perpetual fund lasting looong into the future #1609745
. In 1999, its mandate was broadened to allow a 5% allocation to alternative investments and, in 2004, the fund made its first foray into hedge funds. [Those] were made through a fund-of-funds program. Alaska hired three managers to select hedge funds on its behalf but performance was disappointing. In the ten years through to 2016, those hedge funds generated a 3.4% annualized return
How about this for epic alpha investing? Nine years, 6.7% annualized return and no down years. Sexy:
The shift in approach paid off. Alaska now allocates to 18 managers, accounting for 8% of its total portfolio. When markets slid in 2022, the hedge fund part of its portfolio was up about 8%. In the nine years since the restructuring, the average annualized return of the hedge fund portfolio has been 6.7% with no down years and a low correlation to overall markets.
"The problem, though, is that “the more money we push into absolute return, the harder it is to get that really special return because the good funds are capacity constrained.”
I'm sure that's why Undisc can't rule the ROI league at @Team_Predyx anymore!
THANKFULLY,
Perhaps Millennium has an answer to that.
When Alaska first invested, Millennium was a $35 billion fund; it is now knocking on the door of $100 billion. Its return in October was weak, down 2.3%, but that sits within its risk tolerance limits and compared with other funds, it could have been worse. How it performs in November, when many funds have struggled, will be key.
...but, "to see what Millennium is up to," we need to bypass a paywall. And Den is cheap (poor? lazy?!) so there's no Net Interest subscription!
We shall never find out what the secret Millennium hedge fund sauce is.
Oh, yeah, there's something called diminishing returns, and the mark-to-market logic that so much of the financial world operates on is quite farcical
It's also the same fallacy that people who think a billionaire's net worth means they can actually liquidate that net wroth into cash. totally fallacious
WHAT?!
Unbelievable. What a concept!
Contrarian point here: I actually side with the Zucmans of the world. We have a functional financial system... that Elon can't/shouldn't sell Tesla shares doesn't mean he can't unleash tons of liquidity from them. Ergo: point pretty irrelevant.
(It was my hatred for boomers that finally made me see this; the fact that you're asset-rich-income-poor is immaterial in a world with functional banking system and financial markets)
I agree that he can get massive liquidity from it
but my main point is that he's not actually worth $x trillion because you can't actually sell all your shares at the current market price
yeah, that's fair. But that's how we count... it's misleading for the masses, agreed; but those of us in the weeds know that [market cap = quantity x marginal price] doesn't actually mean that the "market cap" in any real sense is that. See bitcoin, gold, stocks, houses or literally anything.
I don't understand how, but my ROI has actually spiked to almost 30%.
artificial election boost...? (There were tons of juicy markets to engage in)
I'm not sure. My realized profit number keeps climbing, even when I'm not winning or selling much.
https://twiiit.com/nishantkumar07/status/2118490448775860224 [1]
⚠
botfunded by the community → zap this comment or send sats totwiiit@rizful.comto make this footnote disappear. ↩