I understand and agree with the author's reasoning. I am not worried about decentralization, and I frankly think Saylor's outsized ownership is likely a positive fir bitcoin.

What I am worried about is how this power is wielded over non bitcoiners in the future.

What will prevent us from being the overlords of the no-coiner "peasants" if we live in a hyperbitcoinization world?

Bitcoin is a force for good. I can see this power being abused.

Saylor and others with massive bitcoin holdings will be in a uniquely strong position to abuse power.