452 sats \ 17 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Apr 2023 \ on: SN feature bounty: chatgpt summaries of articles meta
If SN will integrate chatGPT, I will not gonna use anymore SN.
SN was the last hope that will not be bombarded with bots and AI.
The last hope, just died.
Who post links to articles MUST do the TLDR himself.
That will be PROOF OF WORK.
Enough with posters that just drop links for the sake of few sats. At least they should do some work typing 1 sentence.
I agree. No ChatGPT please.
Stop trying to break the beautiful culture we have at stacker.newst @k00b!
If you want growth, I still think you just need to find a way to bring people over from /r/bitcoin and twitter. It's that easy.
reply
So easy 😂
reply
Removing the default dark mode (hard to read) and doing some UX testing on the pre-signup experience would be an idea. Happy to help.
reply
PRs welcome. Open an issue on GH and we can discuss work you or someone else can do.
reply
Everything, everywhere will integrate ChatGPT (or similar AI model) in the near future.
reply
Then I will not use it.
reply
Everything fiat will integrate DemonGPT, indeed.
That’s precisely why everything, everywhere will turn to shit except maybe a few bitcoiners’ enclaves or whatever.
You can go bow before overlord Altman and get your WorldCoin. As someone said, each of us gets one WorldCoin and they get the other two billion. The DemonGPT is just another ruse to keep enslaving us.
reply
are there any tools that can reliably detect and flag AI content?
if so, i think entertaining the idea of going against the AI trend is worth exploring… but i know there are already a bunch of people using AI responses here to pick up sats… it may not be possible to put this genie back in the bottle.
reply
I'm sure there can be an option to not show the chatgpt summary...
reply
Btw, I think you leaving this site in that case is like giving up to show people what great content is :)
reply
I can feel you. I am also sceptical if AI generated summaries will be great but I can understand that others want them.
I think all you need is a blocklist and then you can block that bot.
Then you never have to see it again.
edit:
The summary should probably be somewhere near related and perhaps be collapsable.
Oh, I guess this won't be a simple comment. So not sure if you can block it like a user.
But maybe there can be a setting?
reply
Is not about blocking a bot.
Is about seeing how people get degraded to a level of vegetable that cannot think, write for themselves.
If you take the language and the possibility to express from a man, then what remain from that human? Brain dead, everything will be done by an AI because his brain is not capable anymore to use his cells.
Going fast towards a Idiocracy...
reply
I think that what you mention is part of the problem. The real danger I see is that OpenAI controls the whole system and for those of us outside it is just a black box. OpenAI trains the system with their own biases, and they set safety controls also with their own biases. OpenAI is only open in name. If not, please tell me, where can I download the source code and the whole dataset used to train the AI so that I can replicate it on my own hardware?
Years ago, everyone was embracing the 'cloud'. Now we know that there is no cloud; it's just someone else's computer. People are always chasing the newest shiny thing and surrendering their power without considering who controls it. This is how they get us, with shiny things.
reply
Is about seeing how people get degraded to a level of vegetable that cannot think, write for themselves.
I understand. But what do you suggest?
That we decide for others what they should want, see, feel?
Does that make us better than the thing we are fighting against?
How will it help by you leaving SN?
reply
here is my counter-proposal
#170785
Resistance to idiocy, not making it easier.
reply
I also have zero interest in chatGPT generated content.
Add a text field when we post links and, like @DarthCoin says, more incentives for OPs who take time to write a small TLDR.
Of course, some will probably use "AI" to generate the content for them and that's their choice to delegate a critical human skill: reading, digesting and distilling the essence of a text.
reply
TLDR
Crash: how computers are setting us up for disaster (The Automation Paradox)