pull down to refresh

view on twitter.com

What I have learned about companies buying failing companies, is that the reason they do it is because their failure would cause them to fail too

They usually fail shortly afterwards too

This stinks to me. Swan switches partners from prime trust to fortress (same founder as prime) and Bitgo, then Bitgo bails out prime trust clients?

🧐

reply

It seems like Swan might not have done their research. What even is Fortress?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fx04E8mWcAAF5IJ?format=png&name=900x900

reply

Same founder as prime trust so I don’t think it’s a coincidence Swan is working with them. I think Swan might actually have some explaining to do.

To me they seem more like a media company.

reply

Media Company seems like the perfect characterization tbh.

reply

Hate to break it to you Maxis, but as an insider...I can tell you that many of Prime Trusts problems stem from the same legal/compliance/executive team that is now at Fortress...BEST OF LUCK!

reply

the obvious and inevitable failure of 3rd party custodian services does not negatively affect Bitcoin at all

reply

lol I don't think anyone I know was counting on Fortress being much better.

reply

I have verified this information is true and do not agree to these terms of service:
https://app.swanbitcoin.com/agreements/fortress-trust-custodial-account-agreement-8f9668e5.pdf

reply

Could be. Maybe BitGo is too big to fail. I have nothing to do with either so yay

reply

Nothing is too big to fail.

reply

Pretty soon the only reliable way to buy bitcoin will be in person or cash by mail

reply

This is the trouble with building things the wrong way the first time.

reply

Looks like a while lot of consolidation going on and creating custody services that can be easily captured, if you're using an exchange that uses these things get your funds off it, coinjoin and don't expose too many funds to them when stacking

reply

It is just human nature I guess.

reply