Could you imagine if Apple would apply its own rules consistently.
Any banking-app would be banned because you could use it to purchase or donate something without giving Apple its cut.
It is consistent, banking and online shopping have explicit exceptions in the rules since the very beginning.
reply
Fine you win that. But what about the fact that zaps are simply information. Bitcoin is not considered money by Apple. They allow DM's in Twitter, or WhatsApp. I can send emails with pictures, videos. I can send almost any data I want. So why are they censoring Zap data?
reply
Apple should make an exception to decentralized applications. The situation (from their perspective) should be more alike to e.g. a fm radio app. I also wouldn't be too pessimistic that it won't improve in the near future
reply
Apple should make an exception to decentralized applications. The situation (from their perspective) should be more alike to e.g. a fm radio app. I also wouldn't be too pessimistic that it won't improve in the near future
reply
Holy shit, this is a really good point! I hadn't even thought about this. Really pisses me off. I'm done with Apple.
reply
I think their rules only apply to digital content.
reply
It is consistent, banking and online shopping have explicit exceptions in the rules since the very beginning.
reply