pull down to refresh

68 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 20 Jun 2023 \ on: Why I'm done with non-custodial mobile Lightning wallets bitcoin
I had more than 15 channels open and inbound liquidity scattered all over the place. In total enough inbound liq but every other receiving transaction opened a new channel with 3000 sat fees. I'm done with it.
Interesting. Is it possible that you have a lot of small channels and mostly receive sats?
I don't have this problem
write
preview
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 20 Jun 2023
People don't pay attention to my posts and tests... #188654
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @billiam OP 20 Jun 2023
Yes, they do, but your post came too late for me and just confirms my experience.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @billiam OP 20 Jun 2023
Yes, receiving payments in the range 25-100k or sending sats from my private channel node to Phoenix to get inbound liquidity for my private node, lol. It was a total mess.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nerd2ninja 20 Jun 2023
Hmm mostly receive. Buying liquidity from LNBig to blixt wallet would have done them well.
Well, there's a lot being developed that will make lightning even easier than what LSPs have been able to script out on their own.
reply