pull down to refresh

That post uses a link to an archive, which has no paywall, no subscription requirement, and may be easier to read.

The link to the source article from the NY Times is:

Substack’s Growth Spurt Brings Growing Pains https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/13/business/media/substack-growth-newsletters.html

Substack's VP of Communications took issue with the article, and responded with a Twitter thread, started off with this Tweet:

Today the NYTimes wrote an article about Substack. While it's a compliment to remain top of mind for the paper of record, the piece contains a lot of hearsay, cherrypicking, and personal opinion presented as fact.

Here, I offer an alternate framing and excavate the buried lede:
view on twitter.com
reply

And for the complete Twitter thread, unrolled:

Thread by @lulumeservey on Thread Reader App https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1514318085083340807.html

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author