pull down to refresh

Substack's VP of Communications took issue with the article, and responded with a Twitter thread, started off with this Tweet:

Today the NYTimes wrote an article about Substack. While it's a compliment to remain top of mind for the paper of record, the piece contains a lot of hearsay, cherrypicking, and personal opinion presented as fact.

Here, I offer an alternate framing and excavate the buried lede:
view on twitter.com

And for the complete Twitter thread, unrolled:

Thread by @lulumeservey on Thread Reader App https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1514318085083340807.html

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author