pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @jgbtc 2 Jul 2023 \ on: deleted by author bitcoin
Your examples are extremely flimsy. The salary one sounds like some harmless fun, hardly child abuse. The coin stories one was an old guy talking about a draft dodger during Vietnam, so military aged "child" in this case. The real question is why are you doing this? What's your motivation for falsely painting Bitcoiners as child abusers?
1: you have a weird definition of "harmless fun" if it involves the loss of a months salary. Particularly someone's first. No, maybe not abuse, but deception/fraud. 2: Sure, maybe not child abuse, but definitely abuse. 3: As I mentioned in another comment, these are not all examples, just the recent ones I remembered where I heard. And 4: Because I want the community to reflect on how a small part of it treats their children, to be better in the future. If my motivation had been to paint the community in a bad light, I wouldn't have published it on a Bitcoin site. 5: I have deleted the post, since just one commenter took it seriously and the rest are either not seeing anything or are attacking me for pointing it out.
reply
Your post made it sound like this is a widespread problem with bitcoiners. Literally no one in the community is glorifying or advocating for child abuse. Good call on deleting.
reply
That was not the intention with it, as I said elsewhere, it is not common, but seems more common than with people in general. "Literally no one" is pure bullshit, and you know that very well. It would not surprise me if it's some kind of projection from your side. You saying that it was a good call on deleting makes me think it wasn't...
reply
Funny how you make the same assumption about me as you made about all bitcoiners. And based on the amount of evidence (zero). How did you end up becoming such a judgmental prick?
reply