The worst part about this article is that you know its supposed to be the right mix of facts and absurdity, but I don't know which parts are the facts and which parts are the absurdity lmao

"Purcell, who also founded Prime Trust, has been accused of mismanagement and unlawful transfer of corporate assets to a competitor. His decision to pivot Banq, a subsidiary of Prime Trust, away from payments and focus on NFTs without board approval, has been met with criticism."

So I knew the CEO of Prime Trust formed a new company called Fortress Trust, I don't know anything about Banq and I thought the part about Fortress Trust being an NFT custodian might have been part of the absurdity in the article...it wasn't

(and by the worst part about the article I mean that's the best part about the article lmao)