I am preparing an article about money and trade in the Homeric world these days. To me as a political and economic journalist it's like having holidays from the daily shit show. You can follow the struggle on morals and ethics during the pre-classical era and its spill-overs into the early days of the Greek civilization. To those of you who are interested in this stuff I translated some considerations into English.
The main takeaway is the important meaning of making gifts to stabilize the social fundament and relations between individuals.
Here is an excerpt:
Gifts As A Medium Of Exchange
The meaning of money and trade in Homer's Iliad is a complex issue. On the one hand, the poem does not explicitly mention money or barter very often. Instead, it focuses on the exchange of goods and services through gift-giving. This system of gift-giving was an important part of Homeric society, and it was used to cement political alliances, to show hospitality, and to express gratitude.
On the other hand, there are a few passages in the Iliad that suggest that money was not entirely absent from the Homeric world. For example, in Book IX, Achilles refuses to fight in the war unless he is given a ransom of 12 oxen, 100 sheep, 10 talents of gold, and a chariot with a team of horses. This suggests that money was at least sometimes used as a way to measure the value of goods and services.
It is likely that the meaning of money and trade in Homer's Iliad was different from what it is today. In the Homeric world, money was not used as a universal medium of exchange. Instead, it was one of many ways to exchange goods and services. Gift-giving was still the most common way to do business, and money was often used as a way to measure the value of gifts.
The meaning of money and trade in Homer's Iliad is still a matter of debate among scholars. However, it is clear that money was not as important in the Homeric world as it is in the modern world. Gift-giving was still the most common way to exchange goods and services, and money was often used as a way to measure the value of gifts.
This is very interesting and I would be keen to learn more please.
reply
Good to hear. I studied history and ancient philosophy during and after my studies of economics. It always has been my passion.
reply
I recall from my history of economic thought course (it's been a while) that the ancient Greeks viewed the value of both sides of an exchange as being equivalent. That's a pretty normal view historically, but it obviously misses the subjectivist insights from the Marginalist Revolution: that each side of an exchange perceives what they received as more valuable than what they gave in return.
That led to a skepticism of merchants who accumulated gold, because the implication was that they could only be profiting by ripping people off systematically.
Complicating an exchange by including several other goods makes it much less obvious that someone is profiting.
reply
It's interesting, too, that until Aristotle there never has been any profound theory or attempt to develop an economic theoretical thinking that went beyond the ''oikos'' as a simple form of social and fiscal household.
reply
You always have to wonder if there was previous work, or even if Aristotle had more elaborated thoughts, since so much was lost with the Library of Alexandria.
reply
That's right. But my observation always has been that the antique tried to leave economics where it belongs: in the hands of the merchants...
reply
Good post, Tom. This was around the time electrum gold coins were used in Lydia, right? Is my time frame screwed up?
reply
Hola. I think the Lydians introduced coinage in the early years of the 7th century b.c. The Homeric Hymn has been standardized as poetry by rhapsodes in front of their aristocratic audience 100 years before and it was reflecting the rise of greek culture after the Dorian catastrophy between 1200 and 1000 b.c. It's the pure archaic spirit. If You have time You should have a glance at the Iliad. Maybe an audio version. First word of written European culture is ''menin aeide thea'' - sing about the rage of Achilleos. Rage was the theme and the first word. To disappoint anyone here, it wasn't ''Bitcoin''...
reply
I read it 50 years ago and really enjoyed it. Lately I'm very into Roman history, which really began as a result of collecting ancient Roman coins. I'm slowly getting into the ancient Greek stuff too. I think I'll take your recommendation and start by re reading the Illiad. My recollection was that it's a great story- not really straight history, though, obviously!
reply
I read it first during my history studies, partially in old greek. The hexameter has been sung. In the theater it's great, makes You shivers and let's You dive into another universe.
reply
So you can read ancient Greek? That’s impressive. I took a few "classics" courses in college, which is what they called it in the US when I was a student. The upper level courses read texts in Latin and Ancient Greek. That was way beyond my ability or commitment.
reply
No, I really cannot say that. I forgot 90% over the years, but Latin still is very present.
reply