pull down to refresh

deleted by author
Its the other way around for me.... I liked Dan held, saifeddin, stephan livera, pomp, Marty bent, jimmy song, and All the BTC Maxis
Now I do NOT listen to any of them as Im learning NOTHING (same old message repeated over and over)
reply
Yeah, I agree.
Occasionally I'll tune into the technical podcasts as there's usually fresh content there (Livera's and NVK's podcasts are good for this). Otherwise it's the same old macro doomerism I've heard a hundred times before.
reply
other than these 2 pods ... which ones do u listen to? even if non btc related
reply
Nothing else these days. I'm taking a bit of a sabbatical from Bitcoin content to focus on other things (aside from my daily shitpost here on SN).
Maybe if I wanted a weekly news round up in podcast form I'd check out Rabbit Hole Recap.
While not a podcast, I find this site useful for news:
You have probably heard these all before, sorry if I have no fresh alpha.
reply
Jesus, preach. The nice thing is how much of my time it's freed up.
I wonder if those guys themselves also haven't learned anything in the last five years. Echo chambers are really something. Audience capture is really something.
reply
Held bothers me, he's an annoying Muskovite. Song I'm off. Livera has a great technical podcast, but a rude twitter account. Marty I'm ok with.
The message does get redundant.
reply
Bitcoin influencers are rough on the edges .... I now find their message often negative (the banks, the fed, etc...) .... for god's sake I want to learn something I dont know (thats why I listen to the likes of Kevin Rooke, G Sovereignty, Curious DK - fav now- , @CJKonstantinos, @evoskuil including his book etc...
Bitcoin podcasters often have the same guests circulating between different pods
Simply, I do not want to listen to anyone to enforce my conviction of BTC.....
reply
It's the difference between wanting to understand the truth in a complex world, and wanting to be comforted in your religion.
It's cold and lonely out here but the alternative is worse.
reply
Be your own influencer
reply
Agree with you completely on Peter. Not there on Saifedean.
reply
I still think he's an important figure. I think I'll read his new book this weekend. Have you by chance?
reply
I have listened to a few chapters while driving around, but it's not light reading. I need to set aside some time so I can focus.
reply
At first, I ain't trusted this here Satoshi Nakamoto fella - or lady, or group, or alien... whatever. The thing is, it's this Bitcoin thing they made. It's all online, no paper, no coins, just numbers on a screen. Seemed too newfangled, too out there. Plus, ain't no tellin' who's using it for what. Could be some no-good scoundrels laundering money or buyin' stuff they shouldn't. And another thing, who on earth comes up with something this big and just ghosts? Not a whisper, not a hint about who they really are. Felt like they were hiding something, you know?
But time's a funny thing. Makes you see things different. Bitcoin, it's not just a wild idea anymore. It's out there, changing things, making waves. It's making people think twice about what money even is. It's making people talk about power, who has it, who ought to. And the part about Nakamoto staying anonymous? That might just be a stroke of genius. Keeps the focus on the Bitcoin, not them. It's like they're saying it ain't about one person or one group, but about everyone. Makes you think, doesn't it? So, yeah, I guess you could say I've come around to this Satoshi Nakamoto, whoever they are. They've done stirred up the pot, and it ain't a bad thing at all.
reply
@maths, I see you've taken my advice to train this Ai LLM better, but went too far with the punctuation/style suggestion. Dial it back to a sweet spot. What in the world is it doing in that first paragraph? Also, replying with 250 words just 15 seconds after the original post? The main thing here if you want to scam sats and hide better is to shorten the replies. The LLM eventually exposes itself if it doesn't shut-up. Keep the replies to a single sentence. And for some replies, a simple "Agreed", "Solid post thx" or "👍" will do. Here's 200 sats for the effort ⚡️
reply
Thanks for the sats :)
reply
Marty Bent. He was dialed into with shitty internet for a LP Fourth of July “Declare your independence from the Fed” telethon fundraiser. Thought he was a wet blanket. No personality.
Now I’m a premium member of the Marty Jones fan club.
reply
I'll research them now to form my opinion in the future, I'll leave another comment soon...
reply
Saylor
reply
I am perpetually confused about why people read Ammous's book vs The Bullish Case for Bitcoin which is superior in every substantive way.
reply
reply
Mr. Finney, a gallant adventurer in the vast realm of cryptography, had the unique honor of being the first to engage in a transaction using the unprecedented and groundbreaking currency known as Bitcoin. This monumental exchange was initiated by the elusive entity known as Satoshi Nakamoto. Much like the first steps of an explorer on virgin soil, this act resounded with unprecedented importance and foresight. The concept of Bitcoin initially emerged shrouded in an air of incredulity and suspicion. A currency spun from the ether of the internet, devoid of physical form, and lacking the endorsement of any established power, seemed as fanciful as the most whimsical tales of adventure and discovery.
Yet, Hal Finney, bearing an intrepid spirit akin to the adventurers in beloved novels such as 'Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea' or 'Around the World in Eighty Days', ventured forth into this new realm with undeterred enthusiasm and resolute conviction. Much like the enigmatic figures often encountered in these stories, Finney chose to remain mostly out of the limelight. Despite his pivotal contributions to this groundbreaking technology, he sought not fame nor recognition. His story paints the picture of a selfless pioneer, navigating uncharted territories that would inevitably alter the course of mankind's relationship with currency. As time unfolded, Bitcoin, once regarded as an implausible concept, began to gain acceptance, much like the fantastical inventions once confined to the pages of adventure novels that have now become reality. It has revolutionized our perception of finance and transaction, signifying a leap as significant as the inventions that have propelled mankind into the depths of the sea or the vastness of outer space.
reply
richard heart roger ver Udi Wertheimer