Your thoughts on Bitcoin and internet privacy are interesting. While Bitcoin's public ledger does present challenges to privacy, there are ways to set up wallets without KYC and enhance anonymity. However, you're right that against a determined nation-state's cyber capabilities, it might not stand up for most people. Regarding sound money, the concept of privacy isn't a fundamental aspect, as seen in historical examples like Rai Stones. You raise an intriguing point that Bitcoin might push more people towards non-digital transactions like bartering. Additionally, the realization that internet privacy is an illusion might lead to a shift in building trustless, transparent protocols. In-person, physical transactions could become more relevant in the long term. Overall, it's essential to consider the trade-offs between privacy and transparency in the digital world.