353 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 17 Aug 2023 \ parent \ on: SN Ads Suck! Opt Out now with this CSS snippet meta
We only have the experimental ad to give people more sats. We aren't profiting from it. We aren't doing it to sell you. We are doing it to pay you.
My express goal with ads is for them to benefit stackers. I'm not interested in running a product that funds itself with ads and I'm in control and that's not changing anytime soon. I'd rather shut SN down than sacrifice stackers in any way, especially sacrificing them for advertisers.
Respect
reply
ads should be an opt-in to "get more reward" instead of opt-out to "get less reward". just a UX thing to make it explicitly voluntary. Might even increase conversion rates and result in less "Advert Hate" comments on the ad itself.
How will you deal with "pirates" that avoid ads and get still get rewarded? If the goal is to trick advertisers to pay stackers, should be fine to let the pirates be pirates argh!
reply
Opt-in might be the way. We generally want defaults to represent the majority's preference I think and that might be it.
We literally made no changes in anticipation of ads. We just wanted to see how it went with the features we had and adjust. We've gotten a lot of great "direction" on how to change ads and we'll use it.
How will you deal with "pirates" that avoid ads and get still get rewarded? If the goal is to trick advertisers to pay stackers, should be fine to let the pirates be pirates argh!
The goal isn't to trick anyone. The goal is to get stackers more sats. Ideally sats they've earned. I'm not interested in fighting pirates. I support you or anyone trying to avoid seeing ads. I want to help you avoid ads if you don't want to see them. I just have 1 million things to do at any given point in time.
reply
Even more reason to ignore that little ad
reply