pull down to refresh

69 sats \ 17 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023 \ parent \ on: Daily discussion thread

deleted by author

write
preview
1976 sats \ 9 replies \ @orthwyrm 8 Sep 2023

Hmm, are those accurate? I thought I was a net spender.

What do you see here?

https://stacker.news/top/cowboys

reply
9 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 8 Sep 2023
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023

deleted by author

reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023

deleted by author

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 8 Sep 2023
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023

deleted by author

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023

deleted by author

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023

deleted by author

reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @orthwyrm 8 Sep 2023
that was a monthly stat only

Ah, this makes sense. Rewards have been crazy lately.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023

deleted by author

10 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 8 Sep 2023

lol, 0 posts? It's true (except bio)

@orthwyrm may be (one of) the most efficient stackers, ha

edit: okay, looking at top cowboys, maybe @orthwyrm is actually the stacker most in the red, lol

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @orthwyrm 8 Sep 2023

I initially thought so too, but upon further inspection there are some cowboys who have generously zapped ridiculous amounts for rather little return.

@endothermicdev has a stack-to-zap ratio of nearly 1:100.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023

deleted by author

10 sats \ 3 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023

deleted by author

reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 8 Sep 2023

Interesting. What about those stealthy anon bombers?

reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 8 Sep 2023

we're watching from the shadows

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 8 Sep 2023

deleted by author