I see nostr and SN not as competitors. Are two different things and should not be put in the same bag. Who put them in the same bag, still do not understand what is nostr and what is SN. I do not expect more from @NVK he usually do not do his own DYOR for his podcast episodes and talk shit. I was expecting a more professional podcast from a "bitcoin review" but is not at all a bitcoin review...
nostr is far beyond a "new twatter" (that is now). People still don't get it and use it mostly for fucking zapathlons.
Agree. @DarthCoin can you elaborate? What do you think is the main value and benefit of SN? (I'm a big fan of SN)
reply
When I saw for the first time SN (early days) I said: this is it! This is the old Bitcointalk forum but with sats! Will make Satoshi proud about it. Even the name is SN like Satoshi Nakamoto initials! On SN we can have a lot of things that NOSTR can't do it. I see them complimentary not competing. Yes they can interact each others (we have now crossposting) but are not eliminating each others.
NOSTR is totally something else and many people see it only as a new twatter, but ignore the other parts: market, identities, relays, wss, p2p trades etc. I do not like how the zaps were implemented into NOSTR. They should use the standard LUDs that works perfexctly and much better than zaps. SN did wonderful job with implementing LUD-12 and LUD-18 for example. These are 2 LUDs that are really underestimated.
reply