related posts
43 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 19 Sep 2023
Can't blame them. Would you want a permanent record of the shit they turn out visible to everyone forever?
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @kepford 19 Sep 2023
The organization that employed a Stalin propagandist during his purges and supported the weapons of mass destruction lie that lead to the war in Iraq. Yeah. Checks out.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bitman OP 19 Sep 2023
Yeah, not a great look!
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @newnym 19 Sep 2023
If I'm not mistaken, one of the reporters that writes for the NYT is related to the owners of the Internet Archive.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bitman OP 19 Sep 2023
The Internet Archive is actually a 501c 3 though - this means it's a charity or foundation and so isn't owned but run by a board of trustees.
The Wayback Machine was created by Amazon and a company that Amazon eventually bought called Alexa Internet.
But there might be all sorts of chances that your memory remembered some sort of link...
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @kepford 19 Sep 2023
The NYTs deserves to be held in the same regard as any other internet rag. Actually, they should be held in lower regard for their past abuses of their prestige. Terrible organization with blood on its hands. See my comments on Stalin and WMD. There are many other examples I'm sure.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @justBrian 19 Sep 2023
No one wants their stories archived
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 19 Sep 2023
The New York Times, a former newspaper, now an entertainment company
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bitman OP 19 Sep 2023
They are all a bit desperate aren't they.
reply