pull down to refresh
Ah, I see:
https://i.postimg.cc/g06h5Dwb/signal-2023-10-03-135722.jpg
vs
https://i.postimg.cc/qRNCnGT5/2023-10-03-140048-555x156-scrot.png
Yeah, with 1-2 sat/vB onchain LN is only useful for micropayments.
reply
Also , when you receive a payment bigger than the inbound capacity you have you will be paying the onchain fee too.
reply
I have plenty of channels open with outbound liquidity higher than $100 and pay much less than what on-chain fees would cost. If I was doing thousands of dollars, then it would be different
reply
sending "big" amounts like >50$ will cost you more on phoenix than on-chain (with the current on-chain fees).
But if you are sending 100$ or more constantly, onchain is cheaper even with high fees.