21 sats \ 6 replies \ @TomK 4 Oct 2023
A demand shock
reply
160 sats \ 5 replies \ @satoshi_in_the_classroom 4 Oct 2023
👀
reply
5 sats \ 4 replies \ @TomK 4 Oct 2023
To say sth. positive in this world of doomers
reply
60 sats \ 2 replies \ @SatoshisSkeleton 4 Oct 2023
Yup. Would be nice wouldn't it. It ought to be like this
reply
5 sats \ 1 reply \ @Stacksats OP 4 Oct 2023
Eventually, then suddenly
reply
55 sats \ 0 replies \ @satoshi_in_the_classroom 4 Oct 2023 freebie
Boom!
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Stacksats OP 4 Oct 2023
🔑
reply
5 sats \ 3 replies \ @fred 4 Oct 2023
When Microstrategy start selling its Bitcoin off
reply
65 sats \ 1 reply \ @Stacksats OP 4 Oct 2023
Yeah it could dent the market big time
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Stacksats OP 4 Oct 2023
👀💀
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @SatoshisSkeleton 4 Oct 2023
Oh boy haha
reply
5 sats \ 4 replies \ @notgeld 4 Oct 2023
Does it really make sense to apply black swan definition to antifagile tech
reply
45 sats \ 3 replies \ @SatoshisSkeleton 4 Oct 2023
Yes. It's fragile. Humans are the ones using it IMO
reply
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @Stacksats OP 4 Oct 2023
I agree. Tick toc next block but also the network is susceptible to larger people based movements and game theory.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @notgeld 4 Oct 2023
People merely provide meaning for bitcoins. They are unrelated to how protocol functions and this is beauty of Bitcoin. However, if you mean "black swan" in the context of market then yes, why not. Probably makes sense.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @satoshi_in_the_classroom 4 Oct 2023
I agree. But also math and code doesn't matter if no one is using it.
reply
5 sats \ 2 replies \ @joyepzion 4 Oct 2023
It will boils down to the next halving
reply
55 sats \ 1 reply \ @Stacksats OP 4 Oct 2023
2024 could be a wild ride.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @satoshi_in_the_classroom 4 Oct 2023
Buckle up!
reply