200 sats \ 1 reply \ @jeff 18 Oct 2023 \ on: Created this LN enabled website, feedback will be appreciated bitcoin
Does it make sense?
  • The site, as a concept, is great. Novel, and I think it could be viral.
  • "Top ignorers" -> while cheeky, and I get it, it made me pause and go "wtf?". Maybe, consider flattering the targets. "Most Asked", or "Most Prompted".
  • "Most Popular Charities" -> Flag the demo ones as (demo), like you did with ignorers.
Do you see any super relevant bugs?
No, but haven't used it much yet.
Is the UI/UX clear?
Yes.
Consider the following other features:
  • Tagging questions. #economics #transparency #democrat #USA - Maybe people who pledge a certain amount of sats can set them, or even better would be to weight the tags by the amount pledged. So, 500 sats for #USA, but 10000 sats for #transperency, helps you sort/rank things.
  • "Answer as public" -> No point in this. Might as well just set it to "Add Comment", and then let people vote the comments up and down for signal.
  • "Loaded Question" -> If a question being asked, is actually a loaded question, it's really more antagonistic and less helpful, but does have virality implications. IMHO, your site will end up filled with these, and these will be a blocker to your success...but I could be wrong. "Hey Elizabeth Warren, can you share % source of your income in 2023?" is really quite different from (and I'm exaggerating to prove the point) "Hey Elizabeth Warren, how much of your income in 2023 came from licking boots, sucking ass and taking bribes?"
If this catches on a bit, and you want help scaling beyond no-code, let me know...but you're doing great with the no-code options.
write
preview
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NoCodeBitcoin OP 18 Oct 2023
Thanks so much for all this feedback.
  1. Yup, top ignorers is weird. (english is also not my native lang, so I sometimes mess up. I like your idea.
  2. Tagging questions is on the roadmap, just wanted to put out an MVP to see if there is actually some interested so for me to keep working on this.
  3. Interesting point around "Answer as public", makes some sense. I added it because if you can't do that, the site is "hard to engage", and low engagement kills a social app. But simplifying to "comments" makes sense.
  4. I am not sure I understood the "Loaded question" point, but I guess you are saying is that many people will use offensive language. They will if this catches on, but I will need to be "moderating" that if I want the site to be useful. I also understand the dangers of the word "moderating", social is now an impossible thing to manage.
Thank you.
reply