The game is designed so that zapping people is hurting their chance of winning. Instead, the incentive is to zap those you don't want to win. This means players who zap are forced to either support a position they disagree with, or let it win 80k sats.
You are assuming all players are doing greedy action, but I'd say the financial incentive is too low for that.
For me to go into full-greedy-actions-mode (instead of cooperative actions that look for genuine winner) the financial incentive would need to be substantial. I just zapped replies that I genuinely agree with.
I just zapped replies that I genuinely agree with.
Excellent! Thank you for playing. I actually don't assume anyone is doing anything due to greed. Almost everyone willl (i hypothesize) behave as you describe, they'll zap what they agree with.
But what will people comment?
reply