pull down to refresh
477 sats \ 14 replies \ @k00b 24 Oct 2023 \ on: Stacker Saloon
It might be time to raise posting costs ... people are posting absolute repetitive garbage.
What if, instead of having a cool down period, a users posting cost increase or decrease by certain x% amount which is determined by the success of the previous post?
The more successful the previous post, the less your next post cost. I think this would deter users from posting random stuff and it would encourage them to make sure what they post are valuable to the community.
You can have a scale: horrible (between 0-100 sats), good (101-500 sats), excellent (501 upwards). Depending on where the previous post ranks by the time a user post something new, the post fees will get a % increase or decrease according to that rank.
reply
That's a nice twist. It's difficult to communicate but might be worth doing.
reply
I'm glad you like the idea.
reply
It would be neat to make posting costs dynamic. There's some optimal flow of posts, so why not use some form of peak pricing?
reply
Great idea! That sounds like such a rabbit hole though.
reply
That sounds like such a rabbit hole though.
You said that like it's a bad thing. Isn't this a fun problem to think about?
Here's a really simple jumping off point:
Posting cost = number of posts on SN in the past hour
reply
Definitely not a bad thing. It's such a good thing it's a bad thing! I'm surrounded by rabbit holes.
That's actually so simple it's brilliant.
reply
Thanks, I just checked and that would be about 10 sats for the next post. Pretty reasonable for now and it scales well with new users
reply
finally
reply
raises posting costs to 2 sats
reply
tbf I was thinking 10
reply
or 21? not much but still a nice quality filter
reply
Lmao. Won't make much of a difference.
reply
😂😂😂😂
reply