I agree- Samourai continues to decline any debates, I would really love an explanation from them myself.
My guess is that they do not believe it will be a good faith debate. Based on this debate from CD76: DEBATE: Are the tradeoffs of Samourai Wallet's light client mode a benefit to users? and the conversations I've seen it would be very annoying.
My comment about grown ups remains. Both sides seem to be way to emotional about this and lack the ability to clearly explain the trade-offs in a concise clear way. Odell did his best but it was painful to listen to the debate.
I have no idea if Samourai is a honey pot. When you start there you lose credibility. The issue is that you are trusting Samourai when you use their node instead of your own node. That's the issue. Samourai's app does suggest you use your own node.
These "debates" usually turn into pissing matches and aren't interesting or helpful. Reminds me of comments like VPNs are a scam. Or Tor is a honey pot. Its lazy incomplete communication promoted by social media culture.
reply
I'm afraid you are mistaken, Samourai's app does not ever suggest you use your own node, all privacy features are disabled by default and they said no PR will ever be merged to warn users about the risks: https://web.archive.org/web/20230417145554/https://code.samourai.io/wallet/samourai-wallet-android/-/issues/458
reply
Thanks, I misremembered it. It does offer the option before you create your wallet.
reply
hah I would take it one step further and you can actually argue that even if you are using your own node, you are still trusting them. What if they control all the other UTXOs going into a CJ round? There is no way to verify that they do not.
It will be interesting to see if their upcoming decentralized coordinator release addresses this concern I have.
reply