Meta Econ Takeover Day 13 \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

231 sats \ 17 comments \ @Undisciplined 30 Oct 2023 meta

I didn't get much traction on yesterday's post (probably because Sunday evening is a dumb time to put up a post). However, I do want people's thoughts, so I'm just going to repeat my questions:

What's the next major bubble that's going to pop? Alternatively, what's a huge bubble that people aren't really talking about?

view all related items

142 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 30 Oct 2023

One bubble I've been talking about for years is Higher Ed. The costs have been radically outpacing inflation for decades and the returns have been stagnant (at best).

There's been a pretty long trend now (starting in 2016) of college enrollment declining. That had never happened before. Further, that trend is driven by men not going to college, which matters because that's who majors in the STEM fields that generate the "returns to college".

The amount of labor hours, human capital, real estate, etc. currently misallocated to college is insane.

175 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 30 Oct 2023

The only thing I'd say here is that it isn't a bubble that will "pop". Yes it's been overpriced and over hyped, but it won't be too hard to bring costs down by getting rid of useless administrator and getting back to straight education which is still valuable, imo.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 30 Oct 2023

That might be, but I think there is pop potential as people become more aware of how the "returns to college" are distributed. Essentially, only the best students in a handful of STEM fields have positive returns to college, but their returns are large enough to drive the average up pretty high.

It's true that colleges could scale down their expenditures to make expected returns positive for more students, but that would entail a lot of people losing their jobs. Major reallocations in the economy are what "busts" are made of.

Of course, I've been waiting for this bubble to pop for a long time and at best it's slowly deflating.

175 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 30 Oct 2023

This is the second one that came to mind after consumer credit.

196 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 30 Oct 2023

Obvious answer seems like sovereign debt but I think they can kick that can for awhile longer. Maybe it's consumer credit. Seems like consumers are drowning in credit to continue to finance their lifestyles now. Unless the Fed is bailing them all out, it can't end well.

150 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 30 Oct 2023

Obvious answer seems like sovereign debt

"The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent." That always comes to mind when people talk about the debt being unsustainable. It is, but also it's not paid off for those who bet on it.

Consumer credit seems possible, especially with rates spiking.

471 sats \ 1 reply \ @evanbaer 31 Oct 2023

There’s always a 0% apr rollover offer to keep the consumer credit carnival humming along.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 31 Oct 2023

do do dodododododododo do do dodododododododo

175 sats \ 8 replies \ @gabybaby 30 Oct 2023

In financial quarters, car loans. Car payments and terms have skyrocketed in the past couple years as fewer cars are being made to sell for < $30K in USA.

In non-financial terms, some corners of the clean energy market, primarily offshore wind and carbon credits, in my estimation.

Offshore wind is basically completely unviable without direct federal subsidy. Carbon credits are just straight up a scam, with some high-profile carbon "markets" being exposed as such, with purchased credits just going to nonsensical projects that use creative emissions accounting to justify their existence.

If one believes fossil fuels are here to stay for myriad reasons, then the failure of the above would likely be cheered on. But if one believes clean energy is the future, I would argue that person should also cheer on the demise because fewer dollars would get wasted on obvious BS.

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 30 Oct 2023

I've been hearing about the car loan bubble for a while. What are people concerned about with that? One of the big problems with the housing crisis was that people were counting on being able to sell their homes and at least payoff their remaining principle. That doesn't seem relevant with car loans.

What's going to precipitate the clean energy bubble bursting? It seems like it can keep going as long as those stupid programs are politically profitable.

175 sats \ 6 replies \ @gabybaby 30 Oct 2023

It's about the knock-on effects of substantial defaults on car notes where the owners are very underwater. Sure, you can get some recoveries from impounding and selling the underlying cars, but with how leveraged lenders are as a business practice it can compound into something much larger given the scale and scope.

Clean energy bubble is already bursting to a certain extent. Broader ESG movement is quietly dying and it's clear clean energy funds aren't doing well (no surprise there). It could keep going on theoretically but even political capital gets exhausted at some point when there's nothing economically productive to show for clean energy projects.

Since energy security is extremely important at the sovereign level, countries can realistically only tolerate inefficient use of investment dollars for so long. Especially when taxpayers are fed up with lack of progress/are skeptical of the premise in the first place.

What do you think?

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 30 Oct 2023

Those are good points. I figured the car loan issue had to be something like that.

I hope you're right about the energy sector. I could see it, but I also still see a lot of people drinking the Kool-Aid.

275 sats \ 4 replies \ @gabybaby 30 Oct 2023

That car loan issue exists in some form or another all over the credit industry just by virtue of how many middlemen exist between the Fed and the end users. Having worked in credit risk for a personal lending startup, I got to see this dynamic firsthand and was just gobsmacked by how dumb it is in practice. Everyone along the way is leveraged to varying degrees and the health of that system is only as strong as the weakest link.

I agree that a lot of people are still drinking the Kool-Aid, but reality just has a habit of not caring at some point, especially when fiat money is fake and energy demand is very much not. So, I'm optimistic that eventually the stupidity will work its way out of the system.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 30 Oct 2023

fiat money is fake and energy demand is very much not

I wonder how much the huge natural gas shortage helped prop up the clean energy bubble. Whenever oil prices return to normal (or whatever the new normal is going to be) it might make the picture a bit more clear. Right now, wind and solar don't look that much worse, depending on which rigged metrics people use.

175 sats \ 2 replies \ @gabybaby 30 Oct 2023

It also depends which use cases we're talking about. For dependable electricity generation, I'm sure that wind/solar are very competitive in certain geographic regions (assuming power lines and infra are in place).

More importantly, I think, are the uses of energy that go into logistics/transportation and emergency (backup) power generation. And there's just no substitute for oil and natural gas there. They just have such astounding advantages in terms of energy density, portability, etc. that anyone claiming otherwise is a paid shill and/or a charlatan.

I personally subscribe to Lyn Alden's view on the oil market over the next 5-10 years and think there'll be a structural bull run just due to limited capex in the past 15 years. The world isn't going to run out of oil just yet and if clean energy sources can't compete with oil in a world with elevated fossil fuel prices, then it doesn't deserve to be shilled as ridiculously as it is today.

50 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 30 Oct 2023

I'm sure that wind/solar are very competitive in certain geographic regions

It's more that they can be made to look competitive. By focusing on marginal costs, all the issues with intermittency, grid design, base load, and regional suitability can be papered over.

view replies