That's great too! It doesn't hurt to have more places :)
What I meant with the "content to test against" is for e.g. web integration tests it's good to have a specific route that you can test static file serving and check against known hash of the content...
I think hosting bitcoin.pdf is sort a badge of honor. All bitcoiner webs should do it. It also helps to have standardized content to test against...
If you run a full node you already have it on the blockchain. https://bitcoinexplorer.org/bitcoin-whitepaper
LITERALLY every full bitcoin core node contain it.
That's great too! It doesn't hurt to have more places :)
What I meant with the "content to test against" is for e.g. web integration tests it's good to have a specific route that you can test static file serving and check against known hash of the content...
Setting the standard for all zapping sites. Nice to see this happening!
How does one know that this is THE original white paper. Is there known/agreed public hash of the paper itself somewhere?
https://github.com/opentimestamps/opentimestamps-client/blob/master/examples/bitcoin.pdf.ots
This timestamp is from years ago, and should validate against the real deal.
https://OpenTimestamps.org
https://media.tenor.com/q9FDykY6oHkAAAAd/hooray.gif
One of the most powerful documents ever published.
Cool idea, Faketoshi can go fuck himself.
GlenCooper.com hosting bitcoin.pdf: https://glencooper.com/bitcoin.pdf
That didn’t take long to find